PARP inhibitor improves progression-free survival in patients with advanced breast cancers and BRCA mutations
MD Anderson-led Phase III trial meets primary endpoint with talazoparib over chemotherapy
MD Anderson News Release 12/08/2017
In a randomized, Phase III trial led by researchers at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, the PARP inhibitor talazoparib extended progression-free survival (PFS) and improved quality-of-life measures over available chemotherapies for patients with metastatic HER2-negative breast cancer and mutations in the BRCA1/2 genes.
“The trial found that talazoparib provides a significant clinical benefit to all patient subgroups, including those with hormone receptor-positive and triple-negative disease,” said Litton. “The results of this trial are quite exciting and indicate talazoparib is a novel treatment option for patients with metastatic breast cancer and BRCA mutations.”
Current therapies for metastatic cancer include sequential hormonal therapies and chemotherapies, but there are no approved therapies specifically for patients with metastatic breast cancer and a known BRCA mutation, explained Litton.
Mutations in the BRCA1/2 genes, which account for 5 to 10 percent of all breast cancers, cause defects in normal DNA damage repair. PARP inhibitors block an additional DNA repair pathway, and the anti-tumor effects of PARP inhibitors can be intensified in patients with BRCA mutations. Talazoparib works by not only inhibiting the PARP enzyme, but by trapping the enzyme on DNA to further prevent DNA repair.
To date, no PARP inhibitors have been approved by the Food and Drug Administration to treat breast cancers, although three previously have been approved for the treatment of certain patients with ovarian cancers.
EMBRACA is an international, Phase III clinical trial enrolled 431 patients with locally advanced or metastatic and hereditary BRCA1/2 gene mutations. Patients with HER2-positive disease were excluded as there are approved targeted therapies for those cancers. Patients could have had up to three previous chemotherapies, including platinum-based therapies.
Participants were randomized 2:1 to receive either talazoparib (287) or physician’s choice of treatment (PCT) of single-agent therapy (144), either capecitabine, eribulin, gemcitabine or vinorelbine. Fifty-four percent of participants had HR+ disease and 46 percent had TN breast cancer; BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations were split at 45 and 55 percent, respectively.
“Importantly, the trial met its primary endpoint of progression-free survival. Patients were nearly 46 percent less likely to have progressed on talazoparib compared to physician’s choice,” said Litton. “Secondary endpoints also were promising, including a dramatic improvement in time to clinical deterioration among patients receiving talazoparib.”
The median PFS, assessed by blinded independent review, was 8.6 months in the talazoparib arm, compared with 5.6 months in the PCT arm, a statistically significant improvement. The overall response rate, or percentage of patients with tumor shrinkage, was 62.6 percent and 27.2 percent in the talazoparib and PCT arms, respectively. Twelve participants had complete responses, all in the talazoparib arm.
Patient-reported quality-of-life measures revealed a prolonged time to deterioration of overall health, 24.3 months in the talazoparib arm compared to 6.3 months for the PCT arm.
Grade 3-4 hematological adverse events occurred in 55 percent of patients receiving talazoparib and 39 percent of those on chemotherapy, but talazoparib was associated with fewer high-grade non-hematological events, including gastrointestinal and skin/subcutaneous tissue disorders. Grade 3-4 serious events occurred in 26 and 25 percent of patients receiving talazoparib and PCT, respectively. Adverse events resulting in death occurred in 2.1 percent of patients on talazoparib and 3.2 percent on PCT.
The study also will report overall survival, though the data are immature at this point and will continue to be monitored.
“It is encouraging to see this oral PARP inhibitor was well-tolerated and superior to chemotherapy alone. We look forward to seeing how overall survival is affected, but I think talazoparib will be an excellent option for patients with metastatic disease and BRCA mutations,” said Litton.
Litton hopes to continue investigating the utility of PARP inhibitors in additional breast cancer patients with BRCA mutations, including those with early-stage disease, as well as possibilities for enhancing the activity of PARP inhibitors in patients without inherited BRCA mutations.
The study was sponsored by Pfizer. Litton has research funding with EMD Serono, Astra-Zeneca, Pfizer and Genentech, and she serves on advisory boards for Pfizer and Astra-Zeneca, all uncompensated.
In addition to Litton, co-investigators on the study include: Hope S. Rugo, M.D., UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco; Johannes Ettl, M.D., TU Muenchen III, Munich; Sara Hurvitz, M.D., University of California, Los Angeles; Anthony Gonçalves, M.D., Ph.D., Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille; Kyung-Hun Lee, M.D., Ph.D., Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul; Louis Fehrenbacher, M.D., Kaiser Permanente, Northern California, Velljo, CA; Rinat Yerushalmi, M.D., Rabin Medical Center, Beilinson Hospital, Petah Tikva, Israel; Lida A. Mina, M.D., Banner Health, Phoenix; Miguel Martin, M.D., Instituto de Investigaḉion Sanitaria Gregorio Marañon, Ciberonc, Universidad Complutense, Madrid; Henri Roché, M.D., Ph.D., Institut Universitaire du Cancer Toulouse, Toulouse, France; Young-Hyuck Im, M.D., Samsung Medical Center, Seoul; Ruben G. W. Quek, Ph.D., Iulia Cristina Tudor, Ph.D., and Alison L. Hannah, M.D., all of Pfizer, Inc., San Francisco; Wolfgang Eiermann, M.D., Interdisziplinäres Onkologisches Zentrum Muenchen, Muenchen, Germany; and Joanne L. Blum, M.D., Ph.D., Baylor Sammons Cancer Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology, Dallas.