-
MyChart
Log in to our secure, personalized website to manage your care (formerly myMDAnderson).
-
Request an Appointment
Request an Appointment
If you are ready to make an appointment, select a button on the right. If you have questions about MD Anderson’s appointment process, our information page may be the best place to start.
Appointment Information - Donate Today

MENU
- Departments, Labs and Institutes
- Research Centers and Programs
- Cancer Prevention Research Training Program
- Scientific Communication
Scientific Communication
Scientific communication, both written and oral, is the cornerstone of success in biomedical research, yet formal instruction is rarely provided.
Trainees who engage in SciComm (including writing, conversational speaking, and rehearsed presenting) and who have positive expectations about doing so will be more likely to stay in an academic research career. Furthermore, by empowering mentors to be responsive to trainees in their SciComm skills, trainees will be more likely to persist in research careers and be more productive scientists.
Based on decades of SciComm research, we have developed training opportunities such as, funded training programs for postdoctoral and predoctoral trainees, trainee forums to learn bestpractices in SciComm and the job search, mentor workshops to get practice inevidence-based approaches toSciComm mentoring, individual consultations for mentors and/or trainees, and online resources and tips to helptrainees and mentors.
These factors influence a trainee’s intent to remain in a biomedical research career:
- External support includes mentoring style and practices
- Self-efficacy is the sense of competence at SciComm tasks
- Outcome expectations include the sense that SciComm is worthwhile
- SciComm productivity includes past/emerging performance in SciComm
- SciComm task interest comprises enjoyment of writing, presenting, conversing
Outcome expectations, productivity, and task interest directly predict intent to remain in a research career.
Description of Training
Based on decades of SciComm research, we have developed the following training opportunities:
• Funded training programs for postdoctoral and predoctoral trainees
• Trainee forums to learn best practices in SciComm and the job search
• Mentor workshops to get practice in evidence-based approaches to SciComm mentoring
• Individual consultations for mentors and/or trainees
• Online resources and tips to help trainees and mentors
About the Study
Summary of results: Trainees who engage in SciComm (including writing, conversational speaking, and rehearsed presenting) and who have positive expectations about doing so will be more likely to stay in an academic research career. Furthermore, by empowering mentors to be responsive to trainees in their SciComm skills, trainees will be more likely to persist in research careers and be more productive scientists.
Theoretical framework: These findings are based on a structural equation model of intent to pursue a biomedical research career. This model is adapted from the framework of Social Cognitive Career.
These factors influence a trainee’s intent to remain in a biomedical research career:
- External support includes mentoring style and practices
- Self-efficacy is the sense of competence at SciComm tasks
- Outcome expectations include the sense that SciComm is worthwhile
- SciComm productivity includes past/emerging performance in SciComm
- SciComm task interest comprises enjoyment of writing, presenting, conversing
Study Phases
Phase I
Unmatched data of predoctoral and postdoctoral trainees and mentors at MD Anderson and the Texas Medical Center area
Focus groups with mentors (N = 50) and trainees (N = 43)
Cross-sectional survey of mentors (N = 174) and unrelated trainees (N = 510)
Phase II
Matched mentor-trainee dyads, longitudinal data (4 time points over 18 months) National survey (33 states, N = 153)
Intervention Phase
In an effort to strengthen research career intention and help our diverse trainees, we now provide training for mentors. We guide mentors on how to develop their own best practices for SciComm mentoring by providing a highly interactive workshop and follow-up resources. As part of the project, we will be assessing the effectiveness of the workshop over the next 5 years.
Intervention Phase
Mentors
1. Sign up for SciComm training (link coming soon)
1. Learning resources for mentors
2. SciComm facilitator training
2. Give trainees feedback on their science communication
1. Give responsive, constructive feedback on a continual basis (not just when there are deadlines)
2. Guide mentees in asking questions during meetings
3. Make sure mentees understand feedback and clarify concerns
4. Establish high expectations for practicing oral presentations
Trainees
1. Work on SciComm goals
2. Practice SciComm (in front of non-expert and lay audiences)
3. Ask for targeted feedback from mentor and colleagues on SciComm tasks
SciComm Publications
-
Assessment of Scientific Communication Self-efficacy, Interest, and Outcome Expectations for Career Development in Academic Medicine.
-
The Development of Scientific Communication Skills: A Qualitative Study of the Perceptions of Trainees and Their Mentors.
-
Introducing Students to Cancer Prevention Careers through Programmed Summer Research Experiences.
-
The Role of Scientific Communication Skills in Trainees’ Intention to Pursue Biomedical Research Careers: A Social Cognitive Analysis.
Investigator Profiles

Carrie Cameron, Ph.D., mentors diverse student & trainee populations, & in cross-cultural communication, linguistics, & language training.

Shine Chang, Ph.D., specializes in cancer prevention training, cancer epidemiology, & retention of women & minorities in academic research careers.

Hwa Young Lee, Ph.D., specializes in educational psychology & quantitative analysis.

Cheryl Anderson, Ph.D., specializes in social psychology, identity research, & psychometric measurement of survey instruments.

Jordan Trachtenberg, Ph.D., specializes in science communication pedagogy, engineering education, and biomedical engineering.